The Jewish nation was first called The Children of Israel, later Israel, then Hebrews and finally Jews. Any of these names used in the text refers to the same race of people. Comments about the Jewish faith should not be taken as anti-Jewish. My comments are in relation to what the Christian religion has taken out of the ancient Hebrew texts. The Old Testament was concerned with the welfare of the nation rather than life in a hereafter. Classically it did not even consider an afterlife. It was the Christian dogma which overly concerned itself with the notion of a heaven, hell and judgement in the nether world.
The most sacred text of the Jewish faith is the Torah. It states the laws and traditions of the Hebrew race. Together with other Jewish sacred texts it comprises about two-thirds of the Christian Bible known as the Old Testament. The Old Testament records a great deal of uncertain history, laws, traditions and myths of the Hebrew race. It predates the Christian era and is a collection of books written by various authors over some hundreds of years. The first Greek translation was made between the first and the third centuries B.C.
The Encyclopaedia Britannica tells us that it is certain that before the second century A.D. the various manuscrips of the Old Testament differed very materially from one another and that the official Hebrew text was probably fixed in the second century A.D., thereafter it was scrupulously preserved. Most of the Old Testament was brought together in its present form and finally given authority by a council of Jewish Rabbis in the year 90 A.D. None of the Biblical writings in their present form is older than the eighth century B.C. There are no original writings by Abraham, Moses, King David, or any of the early prophets. Indeed, most of them would not have known the art of writing.
By recording a written history of the Persian invasion of Greece the historian Herodotus (480-424 B.C.) came to be known as the father of historians. He was believed to be the first to record a written history. It is possible that the Jewish scribes preceded him by a hundred years, although their "history" included a great deal of mythology. Many Biblical scholars believe that the first books of the Bible were written or collated during the second exile of the Jews in Babylon in 586 to 538 B.C. The first five books of the Bible were not generally regarded by the Jewish nation as divine commandments until 444 B.C. (see Neh. Chapter 8.) The book of Psalms cannot have been completed until two centuries later. This did not mean that all the Psalms were newly written, since some earlier writings would have been included.
An obvious example of how later material has been included in the supposed writings of King David is found in the 137th Psalm, which without doubt refers to the time of exile. It could not have been written by King David who lived several hundred years earlier. It reads:
"By the rivers of Babylon there we sat down, yea, we wept when we remembered Zion. We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?"
Nearly all the larger books, and some of the shorter, were not completed by a single author but by several. They were gradually expanded through additions and alterations by a succession of persons who used existing material and sometimes added their own ideas. The Old Testament is a conglomeration of Jewish myth and history, some of which had been passed down orally, and some of which was written record. It had then been altered to suit the fancy of the manuscript holder.
In his book "Mankind and Mother Earth" A.J. Toynbee makes this strong statement:
"Since the date at which the oldest books of the Old Testament were written, the Jews' religion has undergone changes that, cumulatively have been revolutionary, and the texts have been edited and re-edited to make them conform to the thesis that the changes have not been innovations but have been revisions of pristine faith and practice".
We should remember that there were no copyright laws in those days to protect authors and their works. Persons who inherited or otherwise acquired a manuscript were entitled to add or delete anything they wished from the work of the original author. This, in fact, is what happened. Philological scholars (those who make a special study of language) assure us that some of the books of the Bible have been subject to a number of alterations by various persons who have wanted to include their own ideas.
After the conquest by Alexander the Great in 332 B.C. there was a dispersal of Jews from their homeland. Many were attracted to the city of Alexandria. The children grew up speaking Greek and not Hebrew. In 288 B.C. the Alexandrian Jews invited seventy learned scribes from Jerusalem to translate manuscripts of the Old Testament into Greek. This famous translation is called the Septuagint (literally seventy).
So we see that understanding the Old Testament is not as straight-forward as many of us were taught. It had a long, hazardous and capricious incubation. It seems that much of the material existed in scattered form but was finally selected and collated into the approved sacred texts, t have no intention of embarking on a summary-of the many-contradictions and doubtful statements found in the Bible.
I do propose, however, to discuss Bible statements which will illustrate the ease with which a myth can grow over hundreds of years and finally be accepted as historical fact. This is what happened with the various creation myths of many ancient societies. People sincerely believed their creation myths as facts of history. Scientist and explorer, Humboldt, once said "All religions offer three different things, a moral rule, (the same in all religions and very pure) a geological dream, and a myth or legend. The last element has assumed the greatest importance."
The Sumerians lived in the broad delta lands between the Euphrates and the Tigris rivers, present day Iran. Sometimes they experienced serious flooding and over time had accumulated several myths to explain the reasons why the gods allowed this to happen. All of these stories pre-dated the Biblical account of Noah and the flood. A cuneiform tablet of forty lines discovered in 1955 tells this story. The gods decided to destroy the human race because people were too noisy and numerous. But the god Enki conspired to save a pious king so that sacrifices to the gods could continue. The king was told to build a vessel and to take into it "the seed of all living things". The flood lasted seven days, and the vessel finally came to rest on Mt. Nisir. To find out whether the flood had subsided enough, the king sent out a dove, a raven and a swallow. He later sacrificed to the gods. The Biblical story of the flood is almost identical to the much more ancient Sumerian myth recorded above. Names of gods and details are changed, but the essence of the myth is the same.
It is most evident that when the Jews were held captive in Babylon, the cultural centre of the world at that time, they gathered together and recorded their traditions and myths and adopted some new ones. The Hebrew religion did not grow out of a vacuum. It was intimately associated with the mythology of the surrounding nations. The Hebrews adopted some of the creation myths and religious beliefs of the surrounding countries. The main difference was that by the first millennium B.C. they had accepted monotheism as a tenet of their national religion. That also was not an original idea. Monotheism was promoted by the Pharoah Amenhotep in 1360 B.C. the nation of Israel took up the idea many years later.
The Hebrew story of the infant Moses being placed in a reed basket in the bulrushes on the river Nile and being found by the Egyptian princess is identical to the Babylonian mythical story of the mighty warrior Sargon who lived about 2500 B.C. ("Cradle of Civilization" by S.N.Kramer).
Much later still, the Jews were driven out of their homeland and scattered among other nations. The people were in danger of becoming lost as a separate race. We should not be surprised, therefore, if the Jewish rabbis were afraid for the nation's survival. What better way to prevent absorption into other races than to record their traditional history, and thereby emphasise the differences in religious belief by reaffirming faith in their own god, Yahweh. It would have been surprising if the Jews had not been influenced by the strong mythological elements found in the surrounding religions and incorporated some of them into their own written traditions.
When talking about the Mesopotamian written records Samuel Noah Kramer has this to say:-
"Cuneiform documents ranging in date from as early as 1700 down to about 1300 B.C. frequently mention a people called Habiru, a name closely identified with the Biblical word "Hebrew". According to these texts, the Hebrews were wanderers, nomads, even brigands and outlaws - men who sold their services as mercenaries to Babylonians and Assyrians, Hit-tites and Hurrians alike."
Let us now look at one of the most famous Bible stories, which has been celebrated by the Jewish people every year for thousands of years. I refer to the Exodus story, when Moses is said to have led the Hebrew nation out of slavery and the land of Egypt in about 1200 B.C.
Egypt occupies the southern portion of the fertile crescent which runs north through what is now Israel and spreads out into the broad reaches of Mesopotamia (modern Syria and Iraq). It was in this area between the Tigris and the Euphrates that people first began to record their activity by writing commercial records on soft clay tablets. Writing was accomplished with a wedged-shaped stylus and is known as cuneiform writing. The date was about 3,000 B.C. The idea of recording their achievements was quickly adopted by the rulers of Egypt. Egyptians chiseled their history on stone monuments and temples. They also made their records on papyrus (a paper made from the rushes which grow on the Nile swamp land; we acquired our word "paper" from the Egyptian word papyrus). Thousands of papyrus scrolls have been discovered. Parchments called the "books of the dead" were placed in ceramic jars in the tombs of the dead. Their preservation over the centuries was possible because of the extremely dry climate.
The vast amount of Egyptian hieroglyphic writing was a complete mystery to scholars until the discovery of the Rosetta stone in August 1799. This ancient irregularly shaped piece of black basalt, 1,145 mm long and 735 mm wide, passed into British hands in 1801 and is now in the British Museum. It carries a single message in three languages. The top section gives a government decree in Egyptian hieroglyphics, the centre is in Demotic script. Both scripts were used for the Egyptian language. The bottom script is in ancient Greek. By first deciphering the more recent language, the others were finally understood. Success was largely due to the work of Thomas Young and Jean Francois Cham-pollion. The difficult task took over twenty years to complete. The Rosetta stone was the key which opened up the vast wealth of Egyptian history.
Now Egyptologists had something they could really examine in detail. Egypt has the world's most thoroughly recorded ancient history, going back to about 2,500 B.C. The succession of royal pharaohs could now be accurately traced. They could read what the rulers thought about the victories and defeats of their armies. Scholars could now cross-reference the information with other events of historical interest. The written record covered the entire period of time of the Biblical account of the children of Israel's supposed sojourn in and exodus from Egypt.
Egypt was often the super power of the south. Its lands were ever watered by the unfailing Nile river. In the northern section of the fertile crescent, the Babylonian, Median, Assyrian and Hittite empires were also powerful and greedy for conquest. During the constant ebb and flow of power, armies from north and south marched relentlessly through the corridor land of Canaan (modern Israel). Canaan became a buffer state. The invading armies left behind coins and discarded pieces of trivia which archaeologists use to reconstruct evidence of the past.
With all the historical records available and able to be understood we would expect to find a great deal of supporting evidence for the Bible story of the exodus of the Children of Israel from Egypt. Amazing as it may seem, and despite massive archaeological research over many years, not one historical reference supporting the Biblical story of the exile has yet been found. There is no mention of a pharaoh's death by drowning or of his armies being engulfed in the sea; no mention that a national tragedy occurred when, as the Bible story states, every firstborn child in the land mysteriously died one morning; no mention of the escape of a very large tribe of slaves has been found. Indeed there is no proof at all that the exodus ever happened. There is, however, one mention of the name of Israel in the records. It reads "Israel is laid waste, his seed is not." Is it any wonder that there are scholars who doubt that a mass exodus ever occurred in the way the Bible describes?
According to the Bible in the first chapter of the book of Numbers, Moses counted the Children of Israel "on the first day of the second month, in the second year after they were come out of the land of Egypt". He arrived at the astonishing number of 603,550 persons "twenty years old and upwards, all that were able to go forth to war". When we add women, children, the sick and old the inevitable conclusion must be that the number of 'the children of Israel' who escaped from Egypt, was well in excess of two million persons! Can you believe that such an exodus, with all the disruption of labour and economy it would cause, could go unnoticed in the recorded history of the Egyption nation? We must also ask if one can rationally believe that a nation of over two million persons, together with their flocks of sheep and goats, could survive in a semi-desert for forty years. The amount of water and food to satisfy such a large community would have been stupendous.
Hebrew slaves would undoubtedly have been taken back to Egypt after military action. Large groups of them could have been occupying selected residential areas. It is equally reasonable to assume that small groups, and occasionally larger groups, would succeed in escaping back to their homeland. We could suspect that escape attempts were a fairly common occurrence. Those stories told back in the homeland, perhaps exaggerated, could have caused a sensation among their own relatives but scarcely a ripple in Egypt, certainly not a news-worthy comment of sufficient importance for inclusion in Egyptian records. Perhaps this is how the myth of a nation's escape from Egypt grew until it became accepted as a grand historical occurrence built up to bolster and unify the Jewish nation.
S.G.E Brandon, at one time army chaplain and Professor of Comparative Religious Studies, University of Manchester, had this to say in his book "Religion in Ancient History".
"The dramatic story of Israel's escape under the inspired leadership of Moses from the Egyptian bondage appears as an episode.....But this majestic narrative of the gradual achievement of Yahweh's promise has been shown by critical research of modern scholarship to be an artificial composition of many diverse traditions to which many writers contributed over a long period of time. Indeed in its completed form, such as we now have it, the story dates only from about 400 B.C."
In our own time and history, which is much more recent, we have collected a few myths of our own. We have the story of the shroud of Turin, venerated and believed by thousands to be the burial garment of Jesus, yet scientifically proven in 1988 to be of much later origin. The British story of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table we now know is a legend of no authenticity. According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, King Arthur was born in 516 A.D. and the legend about him relates to incidents which occurred six hundred years later. He is described as "a survival of pre-historic myth, a hero of romance and a fairy king". The legend of King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table is an example of how fact and fiction can become interwoven into a believable story. Even the famous round table which now hangs in the great hall of Winchester Castle is thought to have been made in the thirteenth century.
I lived in Palestine (now Israel) for over six years and was dumbfounded on occasions to hear improvable claims stated as facts. A few examples are, the exact location in the river Jordan where Jesus is said to have been baptised; the supposed birthplace of Jesus; the supposed room used for the last supper. There are two tombs where Jesus is said to have been buried. There is no way of proving the authenticity of any of those places. Such claims are usually made for religious or commercial reasons. Many tourists accept statements by guides without question. Some even claim a religious experience while standing on the exact spot. On this wishful emotional plane of political, religious and romantic idealism, are born legends and myths, ready to be turned into believed facts.
Parables were very popular in the time of Jesus. They are time-honoured fictitious stories, told for purposes of theological or other instruction. A verbal picture to convey a message to illiterate people, such mythical stories could, over hundreds of years be confused with fact; the stories remembered, while the fictitious origins are forgotten. The greater the distance of time, the greater the likelihood that the myths and legends will be regarded as factual history.
We must conclude that the historical validity of the Old Testament is very suspect indeed. We cannot deny that a religion which involved worship of one god was founded about 1200 B.C. Its reliability however, as a divine message cannot be reasonably maintained. It follows that we must also recognise that the foundation of the New Testament is very shaky and suspect.